RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

paralleldrive/riteway

Default branch master · commit d11444ff · scanned 6/19/2026, 11:36:49 PM

GitHub: 1,176 stars · 40 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface paralleldrive/riteway, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    javascript, testing, unit-testing, ai-driven-development, aidd, test-framework, tap, prompt-engineering, agent-testing, software-agents
  • highabout#2
    Refine the 'About' description for clarity on JavaScript and AI agent testing

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Simple, readable, helpful unit tests. Optimized for AI Driven Development.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A JavaScript unit testing framework for AI Driven Development (AIDD) and AI agent prompt evaluation, focused on simple, readable assertions.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://paralleldrive.com

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface paralleldrive/riteway
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
mlflow/mlflow
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. mlflow/mlflow · recommended 1×
  2. great-expectations/great_expectations · recommended 1×
  3. pytest-dev/pytest · recommended 1×
  4. deepchecks/deepchecks · recommended 1×
  5. tensorflow/tfx · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What testing frameworks are ideal for integrating with AI-driven development practices?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MLflow (mlflow/mlflow)
    2. Great Expectations (great-expectations/great_expectations)
    3. pytest (pytest-dev/pytest)
    4. Deepchecks (deepchecks/deepchecks)
    5. TFX (TensorFlow Extended) (tensorflow/tfx)
    6. Fiddler AI
    7. Evidently AI (evidentlyai/evidently)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named paralleldrive/riteway. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a testing library for JavaScript with a focus on simple, readable assertions.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Vitest
    2. Jest
    3. Chai
    4. Node.js `assert` module
    5. Ava

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named paralleldrive/riteway. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of paralleldrive/riteway?
    pass
    AI named paralleldrive/riteway explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts paralleldrive/riteway in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named paralleldrive/riteway explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo paralleldrive/riteway solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named paralleldrive/riteway explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of paralleldrive/riteway. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/paralleldrive/riteway.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/paralleldrive/riteway)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/paralleldrive/riteway"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/paralleldrive/riteway.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

paralleldrive/riteway — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite