RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Xchat1/cursor2api-go

Default branch main · commit 04ccb123 · scanned 5/29/2026, 2:58:07 PM

GitHub: 1,094 stars · 339 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Xchat1/cursor2api-go, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to clearly state its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Free gemini-3-flash | cursor不倒我不倒🙏 ❌ 这次倒下啦
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A Go service to convert Cursor Web into an OpenAI chat/completions compatible API, supporting Gemini-3-Flash.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    go, openai-api, llm, gemini, api-proxy, chat-completions, cursor-web
  • mediumreadme#3
    Explicitly state the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### 📄 License
    This project is licensed under the PolyForm Noncommercial License 1.0.0. See [LICENSE](https://polyformproject.org/licenses/noncommercial/1.0.0/) for details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Xchat1/cursor2api-go
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LocalAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LocalAI · recommended 2×
  2. Ollama · recommended 2×
  3. LiteLLM · recommended 1×
  4. OpenRouter · recommended 1×
  5. vLLM · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I make a non-OpenAI large language model work with OpenAI API clients?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LiteLLM
    2. OpenRouter
    3. LocalAI
    4. vLLM
    5. FastChat
    6. Ollama
    7. LangChain

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Xchat1/cursor2api-go. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a Go service to expose advanced AI models via an OpenAI-compatible interface.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LocalAI
    2. go-ollama
    3. Ollama
    4. OpenAI Go Library
    5. Gin Gonic (gin-gonic/gin)
    6. Echo

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Xchat1/cursor2api-go. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Xchat1/cursor2api-go?
    pass
    AI named Xchat1/cursor2api-go explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Xchat1/cursor2api-go in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Xchat1/cursor2api-go explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Xchat1/cursor2api-go solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Xchat1/cursor2api-go explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Xchat1/cursor2api-go. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Xchat1/cursor2api-go.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Xchat1/cursor2api-go)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Xchat1/cursor2api-go"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Xchat1/cursor2api-go.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Xchat1/cursor2api-go — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite