RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ezyang/codemcp

Default branch main · commit 1ebdb617 · scanned 5/17/2026, 2:31:56 PM

GitHub: 1,615 stars · 140 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ezyang/codemcp, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the "obsolete" notice in README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    NOTICE: claude code is available with Anthropic's $20/mo subscription, so I consider codemcp fully obsolete. However, there are some good design ideas (especially around the Git-versioning scheme) that I eventually want to port into the current generation of agentic coding clis.

# codemcp
Make Claude Desktop a pair programming assistant by installing codemcp.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # codemcp
Make Claude Desktop a pair programming assistant by installing codemcp. With it, you can directly ask Claude to implement features, fix bugs and do refactors on a codebase on your computer; Claude will directly edit files and run tests. Say goodbye to copying code in and out of Claude's chat window!

NOTICE: claude code is available with Anthropic's $20/mo subscription, so I consider codemcp fully obsolete. However, there are some good design ideas (especially around the Git-versioning scheme) that I eventually want to port into the current generation of agentic coding clis.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-coding-assistant, pair-programming, claude-ai, anthropic, code-generation, developer-tools
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a URL to a relevant project page, blog post, or documentation for codemcp.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ezyang/codemcp
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Cursor
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Cursor · recommended 1×
  2. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  3. Continue · recommended 1×
  4. Codeium · recommended 1×
  5. Tabnine Chat · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI coding assistant can edit files and run tests directly on my computer?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. GitHub Copilot Chat
    3. Continue
    4. Codeium
    5. Tabnine Chat

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named ezyang/codemcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need an AI pair programming tool that automates code changes and avoids manual copy-pasting.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot X
    2. Cursor (cursor-sh/cursor)
    3. Codeium (Exafunction/codeium)
    4. Tabnine Pro (tabnine/Tabnine)
    5. JetBrains AI Assistant
    6. Continue.dev (Continue-team/continue)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ezyang/codemcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ezyang/codemcp?
    pass
    AI named ezyang/codemcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ezyang/codemcp in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ezyang/codemcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ezyang/codemcp solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name ezyang/codemcp — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ezyang/codemcp. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ezyang/codemcp.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ezyang/codemcp)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ezyang/codemcp"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ezyang/codemcp.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ezyang/codemcp — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite