RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hellowind777/hello2cc

Default branch main · commit 3373b3e2 · scanned 6/11/2026, 2:26:59 PM

GitHub: 698 stars · 58 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hellowind777/hello2cc, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to explicitly state 'plugin' nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Make third-party models inside Claude Code behave closer to a native Opus session.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    hello2cc is a Claude Code plugin designed to make third-party models behave closer to a native Opus session.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["claude-code", "llm-plugin", "ai-agent", "third-party-models", "generative-ai", "anthropic-claude"]
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [YOUR_PROJECT_HOMEPAGE_URL_HERE]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hellowind777/hello2cc
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI API
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  2. Anthropic Claude · recommended 1×
  3. Google Gemini API · recommended 1×
  4. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  5. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to make third-party language models behave more natively within AI assistant platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Anthropic Claude
    3. Google Gemini API
    4. Hugging Face Transformers Library (huggingface/transformers)
    5. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    6. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    7. Weights & Biases (wandb/wandb)
    8. MLflow (mlflow/mlflow)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named hellowind777/hello2cc. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a plugin to improve agent routing and response style for external LLM integrations.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. OpenAI Function Calling
    5. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    6. Guardrails AI
    7. PromptLayer

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named hellowind777/hello2cc. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hellowind777/hello2cc?
    pass
    AI named hellowind777/hello2cc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hellowind777/hello2cc in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hellowind777/hello2cc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hellowind777/hello2cc solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hellowind777/hello2cc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hellowind777/hello2cc. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hellowind777/hello2cc.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hellowind777/hello2cc)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hellowind777/hello2cc"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hellowind777/hello2cc.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hellowind777/hello2cc — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite