RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

unconv/gpt4v-browsing

Default branch master · commit 8318b11d · scanned 6/5/2026, 8:13:02 PM

GitHub: 563 stars · 244 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface unconv/gpt4v-browsing, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clarify it's an application, not a foundational model or library

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # GPT4 Vision Web Crawling
    
    This is a GPT4 Vision API and Puppeteer powered tool that can answer questions based on website screenshots.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # GPT4 Vision Web Automation Tool
    
    This application provides autonomous web browsing and information extraction, leveraging GPT-4 Vision API and Puppeteer to answer questions based on website screenshots and visual content. It acts as an AI agent for web interaction.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    gpt4-vision, puppeteer, web-scraping, web-automation, llm-agents, ai-tool, vision-api, autonomous-agent
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, choosing a standard open-source license like MIT or Apache-2.0, to clearly state the terms of use.)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface unconv/gpt4v-browsing
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Llama 2
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Llama 2 · recommended 2×
  2. GPT-4V (GPT-4 with Vision) · recommended 1×
  3. Google Gemini (Pro Vision / Ultra) · recommended 1×
  4. Azure AI Vision · recommended 1×
  5. Florence Foundation Model · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to extract information from website screenshots using a large language model?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4V (GPT-4 with Vision)
    2. Google Gemini (Pro Vision / Ultra)
    3. Azure AI Vision
    4. Florence Foundation Model
    5. Azure OpenAI Service
    6. GPT-4
    7. AWS Rekognition
    8. Amazon Textract
    9. Amazon Bedrock
    10. Anthropic Claude
    11. AI21 Labs Jurassic
    12. Amazon Titan
    13. LLaVA (Large Language-and-Vision Assistant)
    14. Llama 2
    15. Fuyu-8B
    16. Google Cloud Vision API
    17. Tesseract OCR
    18. Hugging Face Transformers
    19. LayoutLMv3
    20. GPT-3.5
    21. Claude
    22. Llama 2

    AI recommended 22 alternatives but never named unconv/gpt4v-browsing. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to automate browser navigation and answer questions from visual web content?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Puppeteer
    3. Selenium WebDriver
    4. Cypress
    5. Robot Framework
    6. UI Vision RPA
    7. AutoHotkey

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named unconv/gpt4v-browsing. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of unconv/gpt4v-browsing?
    pass
    AI did not name unconv/gpt4v-browsing — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts unconv/gpt4v-browsing in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named unconv/gpt4v-browsing explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo unconv/gpt4v-browsing solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named unconv/gpt4v-browsing explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of unconv/gpt4v-browsing. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/unconv/gpt4v-browsing.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/unconv/gpt4v-browsing)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/unconv/gpt4v-browsing"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/unconv/gpt4v-browsing.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

unconv/gpt4v-browsing — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite