RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Abnerla/AI_paper

Default branch main · commit 079e751b · scanned 5/28/2026, 7:46:58 PM

GitHub: 599 stars · 42 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Abnerla/AI_paper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to categorize the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    academic-writing, ai-assistant, desktop-app, windows, local-first, paper-writing, aigc-detection, plagiarism-check, writing-tool
  • highreadme#2
    Refine README to reinforce academic writing focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    广义上来说软件可以用于任何写作方面的应用,包括但不限于文章写作、推文写作等,你只需要自己修改提示词即可使用
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Remove this sentence to maintain a clear, consistent focus on academic paper writing assistance, which is the primary stated purpose and feature set.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a URL to a dedicated project page, documentation, or GitHub Pages site for Abnerla/AI_paper.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Abnerla/AI_paper
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LanguageTool
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LanguageTool · recommended 2×
  2. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  3. Elicit · recommended 1×
  4. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  5. QuillBot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools assist with academic paper drafting, outlining, and refining research content?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Elicit
    3. Scite.ai
    4. QuillBot
    5. Grammarly
    6. Semantic Scholar
    7. Humata AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Abnerla/AI_paper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Are there offline AI writing assistants for academic papers that keep data local?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Scrivener
    2. LanguageTool
    3. Obsidian
    4. Text Generator
    5. Smart Connections
    6. Ollama
    7. LM Studio
    8. Llama 2
    9. Mistral
    10. Phi-2
    11. Typora
    12. LanguageTool Desktop
    13. Joplin
    14. Microsoft Word
    15. LibreOffice Writer
    16. LanguageTool

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named Abnerla/AI_paper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Abnerla/AI_paper?
    pass
    AI named Abnerla/AI_paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Abnerla/AI_paper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Abnerla/AI_paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Abnerla/AI_paper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Abnerla/AI_paper — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Abnerla/AI_paper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Abnerla/AI_paper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Abnerla/AI_paper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Abnerla/AI_paper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Abnerla/AI_paper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Abnerla/AI_paper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite