RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server

Default branch main · commit 99b1d8a1 · scanned 6/18/2026, 5:08:06 PM

GitHub: 1,299 stars · 207 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
15 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
0 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a descriptive subtitle to the README's main heading

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # KiCAD MCP Server
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # KiCAD MCP Server

#### AI-Powered PCB Design Automation for KiCAD with LLMs
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    kicad, pcb-design, eda, llm, ai-automation, model-context-protocol, natural-language-processing, hardware-design
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://forum.orchis.ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI GPT-4 / GPT-3.5
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI GPT-4 / GPT-3.5 · recommended 1×
  2. Anthropic Claude 3 · recommended 1×
  3. Google Gemini Advanced · recommended 1×
  4. Octopart API · recommended 1×
  5. Digi-Key API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use large language models to automate printed circuit board design tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-4 / GPT-3.5
    2. Anthropic Claude 3
    3. Google Gemini Advanced
    4. Octopart API
    5. Digi-Key API
    6. Mouser API
    7. GitHub Copilot
    8. OpenAI Codex
    9. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    10. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for natural language control of electronic design automation software?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-4 / ChatGPT Enterprise
    2. Google Gemini Advanced / Vertex AI
    3. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    4. NLTK (nltk/nltk)
    5. SpaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    6. Voiceflow
    7. Rasa (RasaHQ/rasa)
    8. Cadence Cerebrus
    9. Synopsys.ai

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server?
    pass
    AI did not name mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mixelpixx/KiCAD-MCP-Server — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite