RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

logpai/logparser

Default branch main · commit d9d41807 · scanned 6/24/2026, 4:57:00 PM

GitHub: 1,981 stars · 581 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface logpai/logparser, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify Logparser's role as an algorithmic toolkit in the README intro

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Logparser provides a machine learning toolkit and benchmarks for automated log parsing, which is a crucial step for structured log analytics. By applying logparser, users can automatically extract event templates from unstructured logs and convert raw log messages into a sequence of structured events.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Logparser is a comprehensive machine learning toolkit and benchmark suite specifically designed for **automated log parsing**. It offers **multiple, often unsupervised, algorithmic approaches to automatically infer structured event templates** from unstructured log messages. Unlike full log management platforms, Logparser focuses on providing the core parsing engine for researchers and engineers building custom log analytics, monitoring, or anomaly detection systems.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/logpai/logparser
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify the existing license(s) in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### License
    Logparser is distributed under [License Name(s), e.g., Apache-2.0]. Please refer to the [LICENSE.md](LICENSE.md) file for full details on the applicable terms and conditions.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface logpai/logparser
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elasticsearch
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elasticsearch · recommended 2×
  2. Logstash · recommended 2×
  3. Kibana · recommended 2×
  4. Splunk · recommended 2×
  5. Fluentd · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically extract structured events from my unstructured log files?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elasticsearch
    2. Logstash
    3. Kibana
    4. Splunk
    5. Fluentd
    6. Fluent Bit
    7. Grok Exporter
    8. Prometheus
    9. Python
    10. loguru
    11. pandas
    12. Sematext Logs

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named logpai/logparser. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What machine learning toolkit helps convert raw log messages into structured data for analytics?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elastic Stack
    2. Logstash
    3. Elasticsearch
    4. Kibana
    5. Splunk
    6. Apache Flink
    7. Apache Spark
    8. Fluentd
    9. Fluent Bit
    10. Vector
    11. Grok Debugger
    12. Grok Constructor
    13. Python
    14. Go
    15. Java
    16. re module
    17. pyparsing

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named logpai/logparser. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of logpai/logparser?
    pass
    AI named logpai/logparser explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts logpai/logparser in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named logpai/logparser explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo logpai/logparser solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named logpai/logparser explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of logpai/logparser. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/logpai/logparser.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/logpai/logparser)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/logpai/logparser"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/logpai/logparser.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

logpai/logparser — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite