RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

amicalhq/amical

Default branch main · commit a9393dcc · scanned 6/26/2026, 2:32:21 AM

GitHub: 1,384 stars · 124 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface amicalhq/amical, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition core value proposition to the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README starts with a header image, links, Table of Contents, and Download section before the 'Overview'.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert a concise paragraph immediately after the main header/logo, before the Table of Contents, stating: "Amical is an open-source, local-first AI dictation and note-taking desktop application for macOS and Windows. Powered by Whisper and other open-source LLMs, it enables fast, accurate, and private speech-to-text, working entirely offline to boost your productivity."
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., "## 🆚 Amical vs. Alternatives", explaining how Amical differs from cloud-based dictation services, OS-native tools, and raw AI models/libraries in terms of privacy, local operation, open-source nature, and application-level features.
  • lowexamples#3
    Add clear usage examples to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a dedicated "Usage" or "Quick Start" section demonstrating how to install and immediately begin dictating, perhaps with simple text instructions, screenshots, or short GIFs, highlighting common workflows.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface amicalhq/amical
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Whisper
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Whisper · recommended 1×
  2. openai/whisper · recommended 1×
  3. ggerganov/whisper.cpp · recommended 1×
  4. SYSTRAN/faster-whisper · recommended 1×
  5. Mozilla DeepSpeech · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I quickly convert speech to text offline using open-source AI models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Whisper
    2. openai/whisper (openai/whisper)
    3. ggerganov/whisper.cpp (ggerganov/whisper.cpp)
    4. SYSTRAN/faster-whisper (SYSTRAN/faster-whisper)
    5. Mozilla DeepSpeech
    6. Kaldi
    7. Vosk

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named amicalhq/amical. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best local dictation tools for improving productivity on a Mac or Windows PC?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Dragon Professional Individual
    2. Windows Speech Recognition
    3. Apple Dictation
    4. Voice In
    5. Tazti

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named amicalhq/amical. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of amicalhq/amical?
    pass
    AI named amicalhq/amical explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts amicalhq/amical in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named amicalhq/amical explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo amicalhq/amical solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named amicalhq/amical explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of amicalhq/amical. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/amicalhq/amical.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/amicalhq/amical)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/amicalhq/amical"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/amicalhq/amical.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

amicalhq/amical — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite