RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux

Default branch main · commit 84da8c5b · scanned 5/13/2026, 5:26:44 PM

GitHub: 4,683 stars · 338 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to highlight unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **Unofficial Microsoft Teams client for Linux** — a native desktop app that wraps the Teams web version with enhanced Linux integration.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Unofficial Microsoft Teams client for Linux** — a native desktop app that wraps the Teams web version, providing **enhanced Linux integration and features missing from the official web app or generic wrappers.**
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Why use this?' or 'Comparison' section to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '## Why Teams for Linux?', explicitly detailing the benefits over using the Teams web app directly or generic Electron wrappers, elaborating on features like native notifications, tray integration, and multi-account support.
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    electron, linux, microsoft, teams
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    electron, linux, microsoft, teams, desktop-integration, unofficial-client

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Microsoft Teams
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Microsoft Teams · recommended 2×
  2. Zoom · recommended 2×
  3. Slack · recommended 1×
  4. Discord · recommended 1×
  5. Element · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Are there good Linux desktop apps for popular web-based team communication platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Slack
    2. Discord
    3. Microsoft Teams
    4. Element
    5. Zoom
    6. Jitsi Meet
    7. Telegram Desktop

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to get system notifications and tray integration for web-based meeting applications on Linux?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Nativefier
    2. WebCord
    3. Ferdium
    4. Zoom
    5. Microsoft Teams
    6. Google Meet Notifications
    7. GNOME Web (Epiphany)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux?
    pass
    AI did not name IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

IsmaelMartinez/teams-for-linux — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite