RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

anan1213095357/PiPiClaw

Default branch master · commit 37a63139 · scanned 6/11/2026, 8:46:47 PM

GitHub: 504 stars · 49 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface anan1213095357/PiPiClaw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise, descriptive 'About' description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    PiPiClaw is a lightweight, cross-platform personal AI agent/smart butler that runs locally, compatible with OpenAI-protocol LLMs (Qwen, DeepSeek, OpenAI, etc.) and integrates with 10,000+ skills for automation, development, and data processing.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface anan1213095357/PiPiClaw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LM Studio
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LM Studio · recommended 2×
  2. continue-dev/continue · recommended 1×
  3. OpenInterpreter/Open-Interpreter · recommended 1×
  4. Smol-AI/Smol-Developer · recommended 1×
  5. Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a lightweight, cross-platform AI agent to automate development tasks locally.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Continue.dev (continue-dev/continue)
    2. Open Interpreter (OpenInterpreter/Open-Interpreter)
    3. Smol-AI/Smol-Developer (Smol-AI/Smol-Developer)
    4. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    5. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    6. LM Studio

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named anan1213095357/PiPiClaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an extensible, local AI assistant with broad LLM compatibility and skill integration.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Home Assistant
    2. Mycroft AI
    3. Rhasspy
    4. Ollama
    5. LM Studio
    6. Open Assistant
    7. LocalAI
    8. Jarvis
    9. Mycroft-Jarvis
    10. Jarvis-AI

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named anan1213095357/PiPiClaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of anan1213095357/PiPiClaw?
    pass
    AI named anan1213095357/PiPiClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts anan1213095357/PiPiClaw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named anan1213095357/PiPiClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo anan1213095357/PiPiClaw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named anan1213095357/PiPiClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of anan1213095357/PiPiClaw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/anan1213095357/PiPiClaw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/anan1213095357/PiPiClaw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/anan1213095357/PiPiClaw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/anan1213095357/PiPiClaw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

anan1213095357/PiPiClaw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite