RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

joelhooks/swarm-tools

Default branch main · commit b6852530 · scanned 6/11/2026, 5:07:37 PM

GitHub: 699 stars · 61 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface joelhooks/swarm-tools, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clarify its purpose and avoid misinterpretation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Swarm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Swarm: Multi-Agent Coordination for OpenCode & AI Development

**This project is NOT related to Docker Swarm.**

**Multi-agent coordination that survives context death.**
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text for the MIT License.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Swarm?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, after 'What It Does', titled 'Why Swarm? (vs. CrewAI, AutoGen, etc.)' that explicitly positions Swarm as a multi-agent coordination tool specifically for OpenCode and AI development, highlighting its unique features like context survival, agent issue tracking, and direct integration, in contrast to more general frameworks.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface joelhooks/swarm-tools
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CrewAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  2. AutoGen · recommended 1×
  3. LangChain Agents · recommended 1×
  4. MetaGPT · recommended 1×
  5. Haystack Agents · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for breaking down large programming tasks into smaller, parallel agent sub-tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CrewAI
    2. AutoGen
    3. LangChain Agents
    4. MetaGPT
    5. Haystack Agents

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named joelhooks/swarm-tools. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to coordinate multiple AI agents for complex software development with learning and tracking?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGPT
    3. CrewAI
    4. Microsoft AutoGen
    5. OpenAI Assistants API
    6. RabbitMQ
    7. Apache Kafka
    8. Python
    9. Node.js
    10. PostgreSQL
    11. MongoDB
    12. MLflow

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named joelhooks/swarm-tools. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of joelhooks/swarm-tools?
    pass
    AI named joelhooks/swarm-tools explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts joelhooks/swarm-tools in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named joelhooks/swarm-tools explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo joelhooks/swarm-tools solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named joelhooks/swarm-tools explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of joelhooks/swarm-tools. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/joelhooks/swarm-tools.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/joelhooks/swarm-tools)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/joelhooks/swarm-tools"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/joelhooks/swarm-tools.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

joelhooks/swarm-tools — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite