REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers
Default branch master · commit 17fc597c · scanned 6/25/2026, 11:07:49 AM
GitHub: 1,856 stars · 296 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highlicense#1Add a LICENSE file to the repository
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXCreate a LICENSE file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
- highreadme#2Reposition README intro to clarify resource type and chatbot's role
Why:
CURRENTA curated list of Graph/Transformer-based papers and resources for fraud, anomaly, and outlier detection. We have an interactive dashboard to view/filter/search the papers listed in this repo. To facilitate deep research, we developed a local RAG-based LLM chatbot with 250 publicly accessible papers.
COPY-PASTE FIXThis repository is an **awesome, curated list** of Graph/Transformer-based papers and resources for fraud, anomaly, and outlier detection. It functions as a comprehensive collection, distinct from general search engines or LLMs. We also offer an interactive dashboard to explore these papers. Note: The local RAG-based LLM chatbot mentioned below is a separate tool, not the repository itself.
- mediumreadme#3Add a 'Differentiators' section to the README
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXAdd a new section to the README, for example, '## Why this list? (Differentiators)' with text similar to: 'Unlike general academic search engines (e.g., Google Scholar, arXiv), this repository offers a highly specific and **curated collection** of research papers exclusively focused on **Graph/Transformer-based fraud, anomaly, and outlier detection**. Our interactive dashboard and dedicated LLM chatbot further enhance the research experience beyond simple search results.'
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- Google Scholar · recommended 1×
- arXiv · recommended 1×
- IEEE Xplore Digital Library · recommended 1×
- ACM Digital Library · recommended 1×
- Semantic Scholar · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhere can I find academic papers on graph neural networks for fraud detection?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Google Scholar
- arXiv
- IEEE Xplore Digital Library
- ACM Digital Library
- Semantic Scholar
- ResearchGate
- KDD
- NeurIPS
- ICML
- AAAI
- WWW
AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat are the best transformer and deep learning approaches for anomaly detection research?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- GPT-3.5
- GPT-4
- Llama 2
- Mistral
- TranAD
- OmniAnomaly
- Informer
- Autoformer
- PyTorch-Forecasting
- GluonTS
- AnoGAN
- GANomaly
- SimCLR
- BYOL
AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers?passAI did not name safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
safe-graph/graph-fraud-detection-papers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite