RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler

Default branch main · commit f44464ea · scanned 6/17/2026, 9:53:05 AM

GitHub: 498 stars · 37 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
15 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
0 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify AI agent scheduling

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Put Claude on autopilot. Schedule code reviews, security audits, and anything else - Claude Code runs them automatically, even while you sleep.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Put Claude on autopilot to schedule and run AI agent tasks.** Automate recurring AI-driven workflows like code reviews, security audits, and custom development actions, leveraging Claude's code generation and execution capabilities.
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a comparison section to differentiate from CI/CD tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, e.g., 'Why Claude Code Scheduler vs. CI/CD?' explaining that while CI/CD tools schedule pre-defined scripts, this repo schedules AI agents that generate and execute code based on natural language prompts.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Actions
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Actions · recommended 2×
  2. GitLab CI/CD · recommended 2×
  3. Azure Pipelines · recommended 1×
  4. DeepCode AI · recommended 1×
  5. Snyk · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate recurring AI agent tasks like code reviews and security audits?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Actions
    2. GitLab CI/CD
    3. Azure Pipelines
    4. DeepCode AI
    5. Snyk
    6. SonarQube
    7. Semgrep (returntocorp/semgrep)
    8. OpenAI API
    9. Anthropic API

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow scheduling an AI assistant to perform development workflow actions automatically?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Actions
    2. GitLab CI/CD
    3. Jenkins (jenkinsci/jenkins)
    4. Apache Airflow (apache/airflow)
    5. Azure DevOps Pipelines
    6. CircleCI
    7. Prefect (PrefectHQ/prefect)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler?
    pass
    AI did not name jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler — RepoGEO report