RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

uccl-project/uccl

Default branch main · commit e00bdfd3 · scanned 5/18/2026, 10:37:27 PM

GitHub: 1,369 stars · 146 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface uccl-project/uccl, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear, concise identity statement at the very top of the README.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with a centered div and navigation links before the 'About' section.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    UCCL is an efficient, high-performance communication library for GPUs, specifically designed for distributed AI/ML and HPC workloads.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Elevate the performance comparison with NCCL/RCCL to a prominent section.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The performance comparison is currently within a <details> tag under the 'About' section.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why UCCL? Outperforming NCCL/RCCL
    UCCL-collective (UCCL-Tran) is a drop-in replacement for NVIDIA NCCL and AMD RCCL, designed to deliver significantly higher performance for GPU communication. For example, UCCL-collective outperforms NCCL by up to **2.5x** for AllReduce on six HGX servers (across two racks) with 8x400G CX-7 RoCE NICs and 8xH100 GPUs.
  • lowtopics#3
    Review and expand existing GitHub topics for better specificity.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, allreduce, amd, broadcom, collective, cuda, gpu, hpc, kvcache, llm, moe, networking, nvidia, p2p, rdma
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, allreduce, amd, broadcom, collective, cuda, distributed-computing, gpu, hpc, kvcache, llm, machine-learning, moe, networking, nvidia, p2p, rdma, deep-learning

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface uccl-project/uccl
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
NVIDIA NCCL
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. NVIDIA NCCL · recommended 2×
  2. open-mpi/ompi · recommended 1×
  3. openucx/ucx · recommended 1×
  4. Intel MPI · recommended 1×
  5. ofiwg/libfabric · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to achieve high-performance, portable GPU communication for distributed AI/ML workloads?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NVIDIA NCCL
    2. Open MPI (open-mpi/ompi)
    3. UCX (openucx/ucx)
    4. Intel MPI
    5. OFI (ofiwg/libfabric)
    6. Horovod (horovod/horovod)
    7. PyTorch Distributed (pytorch/pytorch)
    8. Gloo (facebookincubator/gloo)
    9. TensorFlow Distributed (tensorflow/tensorflow)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named uccl-project/uccl. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Are there drop-in replacements for standard GPU collective communication with better performance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NVIDIA NCCL
    2. Open MPI
    3. Intel MPI Library
    4. HPC-X
    5. UCX
    6. AMD RCCL

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named uccl-project/uccl. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of uccl-project/uccl?
    pass
    AI named uccl-project/uccl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts uccl-project/uccl in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named uccl-project/uccl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo uccl-project/uccl solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named uccl-project/uccl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of uccl-project/uccl. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/uccl-project/uccl.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/uccl-project/uccl)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/uccl-project/uccl"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/uccl-project/uccl.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

uccl-project/uccl — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite