RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

greyhaven-ai/autocontext

Default branch main · commit 2090aeb7 · scanned 6/25/2026, 11:46:45 AM

GitHub: 1,223 stars · 101 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface greyhaven-ai/autocontext, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README opening to specify LLM agent focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    a recursive self-improving harness designed to help your agents (and future iterations of those agents) succeed on any task
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A recursive, self-improving harness for **Large Language Model (LLM) agents**, designed to help them (and future iterations) succeed on any task by managing context and learning from real evaluation.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific LLM agent evaluation and context management topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, autoresearch, claude, claude-code, codex, hermes, hermes-agent, llms, ml, openclaw, pi, pi-coding-agent
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, autoresearch, claude, claude-code, codex, hermes, hermes-agent, llms, ml, openclaw, pi, pi-coding-agent, llm-agents, agent-evaluation, context-management, llm-orchestration, agent-framework
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add homepage URL to repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://autocontext.ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface greyhaven-ai/autocontext
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Stable Baselines3 (SB3)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Stable Baselines3 (SB3) · recommended 1×
  2. Ray RLlib · recommended 1×
  3. DeepMind's Acme · recommended 1×
  4. Gymnasium · recommended 1×
  5. TensorFlow Agents (TF-Agents) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build AI agents that learn and improve over repeated task executions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Stable Baselines3 (SB3)
    2. Ray RLlib
    3. DeepMind's Acme
    4. Gymnasium
    5. TensorFlow Agents (TF-Agents)
    6. PyTorch Lightning

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named greyhaven-ai/autocontext. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to manage and evaluate agent performance for complex, multi-step tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. Phoenix
    3. W&B Prompts
    4. OpenAI Evals
    5. Humanloop
    6. MLflow

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named greyhaven-ai/autocontext. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of greyhaven-ai/autocontext?
    pass
    AI named greyhaven-ai/autocontext explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts greyhaven-ai/autocontext in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named greyhaven-ai/autocontext explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo greyhaven-ai/autocontext solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named greyhaven-ai/autocontext explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of greyhaven-ai/autocontext. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/greyhaven-ai/autocontext.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/greyhaven-ai/autocontext)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/greyhaven-ai/autocontext"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/greyhaven-ai/autocontext.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

greyhaven-ai/autocontext — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite