RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rotemtzaban/STIT

Default branch main · commit fac087f2 · scanned 5/19/2026, 9:33:30 AM

GitHub: 1,199 stars · 166 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rotemtzaban/STIT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A framework for GAN-based facial editing of real videos, focusing on maintaining high temporal consistency and leveraging StyleGAN's latent space.
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README H1 to specify the project's core purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # STIT - Stitch it in Time
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # STIT - Stitch it in Time: A GAN-Based Framework for Temporally Consistent Facial Video Editing

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface rotemtzaban/STIT
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DeepFaceLab
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DeepFaceLab · recommended 2×
  2. FaceFusion · recommended 2×
  3. RunwayML · recommended 2×
  4. Adobe After Effects · recommended 2×
  5. InsightFaceSwap · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking tools for realistic AI-driven facial modifications in videos, ensuring temporal consistency.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepFaceLab
    2. FaceFusion
    3. InsightFaceSwap
    4. EbSynth
    5. NVIDIA Broadcast
    6. RunwayML
    7. Adobe After Effects

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named rotemtzaban/STIT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective techniques for stable, high-fidelity AI facial editing across video sequences?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepFaceLab
    2. FaceFusion
    3. InsightFace
    4. Roop
    5. FaceSwapper
    6. Adobe After Effects
    7. Mocha Pro
    8. Boris FX Optics
    9. Nuke
    10. Cara VR
    11. RunwayML

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named rotemtzaban/STIT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rotemtzaban/STIT?
    pass
    AI named rotemtzaban/STIT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts rotemtzaban/STIT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named rotemtzaban/STIT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo rotemtzaban/STIT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named rotemtzaban/STIT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rotemtzaban/STIT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rotemtzaban/STIT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rotemtzaban/STIT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rotemtzaban/STIT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rotemtzaban/STIT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rotemtzaban/STIT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite