RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

limecloud/lime

Default branch main · commit a1c0781f · scanned 5/29/2026, 12:32:18 PM

GitHub: 1,424 stars · 201 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface limecloud/lime, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify project identity and avoid name collision

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Lime
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Lime: AI Content Workspace for Chinese Creators
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, or GPL-3.0) in the repository root.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Refine repository topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, agent-collaboration, agent-harness, agentic-ai, ai, claw, content-creation, creators, deepseek, desktop-app, knowledge-base, mcp, research-tool, skills, workflow, writing-tool
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, ai-workspace, chinese-language, content-creation, creators, deepseek, desktop-app, knowledge-base, long-form-content, prompt-engineering, research-tool, workflow, writing-tool

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface limecloud/lime
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 3×
  2. Claude · recommended 2×
  3. Notion AI · recommended 1×
  4. Notion Desktop App · recommended 1×
  5. Obsidian · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need a desktop AI assistant for long-form content creation and knowledge management in Chinese.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Notion AI
    2. Notion Desktop App
    3. Obsidian
    4. Smart Connections (brawner/smart-connections)
    5. Text Generator (nhaouari/obsidian-text-generator)
    6. Typora
    7. ChatGPT
    8. Claude
    9. Wenxin Yiyan
    10. Scrivener
    11. ChatGPT
    12. Claude
    13. Microsoft Word
    14. Microsoft Copilot
    15. Quip
    16. ChatGPT

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named limecloud/lime. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an integrated open-source AI workspace for research, prompt management, and multi-model content workflows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. Streamlit
    3. Gradio
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. Haystack by deepset
    6. FlowiseAI
    7. Open-WebUI
    8. LocalAI

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named limecloud/lime. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of limecloud/lime?
    pass
    AI named limecloud/lime explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts limecloud/lime in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named limecloud/lime explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo limecloud/lime solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name limecloud/lime — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of limecloud/lime. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/limecloud/lime.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/limecloud/lime)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/limecloud/lime"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/limecloud/lime.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

limecloud/lime — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite