RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

qicfan/qmediasync

Default branch main · commit 3589f316 · scanned 6/13/2026, 9:11:49 PM

GitHub: 567 stars · 71 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface qicfan/qmediasync, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and add a clear introductory sentence

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # QMediaSync
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # QMediaSync: Cloud Drive to Emby/Jellyfin Media Sync & STRM Generator

QMediaSync is a powerful tool designed to automatically synchronize media files from various cloud drive open platforms with media servers like Emby or Jellyfin. It generates STRM files, manages metadata, and enables direct playback and advanced library management features.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics for categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cloud-drive, emby, jellyfin, strm, media-server, metadata, 115-cloud, media-sync, go, golang
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add homepage URL, linking to the frontend

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (The URL for the QMediaSync-Frontend project or a dedicated project page)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface qicfan/qmediasync
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
rclone/rclone
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. rclone/rclone · recommended 2×
  2. CloudDrive · recommended 1×
  3. syncthing/syncthing · recommended 1×
  4. Google Drive for Desktop · recommended 1×
  5. OneDrive Sync Client · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically synchronize cloud drive media files with Emby for playback and library management?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rclone (rclone/rclone)
    2. CloudDrive
    3. Syncthing (syncthing/syncthing)
    4. Google Drive for Desktop
    5. OneDrive Sync Client
    6. Dropbox Desktop App
    7. PlexDrive (dweidenfeld/plexdrive)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named qicfan/qmediasync. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for generating STRM files from cloud storage and managing media metadata for Emby libraries?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MediaInfo CLI
    2. Google Drive
    3. S3
    4. rclone (rclone/rclone)
    5. Plex
    6. Emby
    7. Google Drive API
    8. Amazon S3 API
    9. FileBot

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named qicfan/qmediasync. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of qicfan/qmediasync?
    pass
    AI named qicfan/qmediasync explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts qicfan/qmediasync in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named qicfan/qmediasync explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo qicfan/qmediasync solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named qicfan/qmediasync explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of qicfan/qmediasync. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/qicfan/qmediasync.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/qicfan/qmediasync)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/qicfan/qmediasync"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/qicfan/qmediasync.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

qicfan/qmediasync — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite