RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Safe3/uusec-waf

Default branch main · commit c08c23cf · scanned 5/15/2026, 9:11:42 PM

GitHub: 1,648 stars · 163 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Safe3/uusec-waf, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Elevate core definition to top of README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current structure where the definition is in a blockquote under '# Introduction' and preceded by a `<p align="center">` block.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Place the following text directly after the main title (e.g., `# UUSEC WAF`): `**UUSEC WAF** is an industrial grade free, high-performance, and highly scalable Web Application Firewall and API security protection product that supports AI and semantic engines. It is a comprehensive website protection product launched by UUSEC Technology, which first realizes the three-layer defense function of traffic layer, system layer, and runtime layer.`
  • lowreadme#2
    Reposition navigation links below core definition

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The `<p align="center">` block with navigation links is the very first content in the README excerpt.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the entire `<p align="center">...</p>` block (containing '🏠 Home' and '中文版') to appear *after* the new, elevated core definition and descriptive H1.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Safe3/uusec-waf
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AWS WAF
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AWS WAF · recommended 2×
  2. ModSecurity · recommended 1×
  3. Cloudflare · recommended 1×
  4. Nginx · recommended 1×
  5. Akamai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a free, high-performance web application firewall with AI for API security.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ModSecurity
    2. Cloudflare
    3. AWS WAF
    4. Nginx
    5. Akamai
    6. OWASP CRS

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Safe3/uusec-waf. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an advanced WAAP solution to protect against SQL injection and 0-day threats.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cloudflare WAAP
    2. Akamai App & API Protector
    3. F5 Advanced WAF
    4. Imperva App Protect
    5. AWS WAF
    6. AWS Firewall Manager
    7. Fortinet
    8. Imperva

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named Safe3/uusec-waf. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Safe3/uusec-waf?
    pass
    AI named Safe3/uusec-waf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Safe3/uusec-waf in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Safe3/uusec-waf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Safe3/uusec-waf solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Safe3/uusec-waf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Safe3/uusec-waf. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Safe3/uusec-waf.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Safe3/uusec-waf)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Safe3/uusec-waf"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Safe3/uusec-waf.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Safe3/uusec-waf — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite