RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails

Default branch main · commit 499f9780 · scanned 5/16/2026, 7:12:41 PM

GitHub: 1,180 stars · 160 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to highlight content value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository is an archive of Quincy Larson's weekly email newsletter.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository archives Quincy Larson's weekly email newsletter, offering curated programming, cybersecurity, and general tech learning resources from freeCodeCamp.org.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the freeCodeCamp.org homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.freecodecamp.org/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
TLDR Newsletter
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. TLDR Newsletter · recommended 1×
  2. Hacker News · recommended 1×
  3. SANS Internet Storm Center (ISC) Handler's Diary · recommended 1×
  4. The CyberWire · recommended 1×
  5. DevOps Weekly · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find curated weekly programming and cybersecurity learning resources?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TLDR Newsletter
    2. Hacker News
    3. SANS Internet Storm Center (ISC) Handler's Diary
    4. The CyberWire
    5. DevOps Weekly
    6. InfoSec Write-ups
    7. OWASP News

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good sources for new technical courses and educational content updates?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Coursera
    2. edX
    3. Pluralsight
    4. Udemy
    5. O'Reilly Learning
    6. LinkedIn Learning
    7. FreeCodeCamp

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails?
    pass
    AI did not name freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

freeCodeCamp/awesome-quincy-larson-emails — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite