RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents

Default branch main · commit 828bbc6e · scanned 6/12/2026, 7:37:47 AM

GitHub: 541 stars · 130 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome-list, cli-agents, ai-coding, developer-tools, terminal-tools, code-generation, code-debugging, agent-orchestration
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Choose and add a standard open-source license file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) to the root of the repository.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the repository's homepage URL to "https://github.com/bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents" or a dedicated project page if one exists.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Cursor
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Cursor · recommended 1×
  2. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  3. Continue · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  5. Smol-developer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for AI tools that can autonomously write and debug code directly from my terminal.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. GitHub Copilot Chat
    3. Continue
    4. OpenAI API
    5. Smol-developer

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best command-line AI assistants for automating development tasks and code changes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot CLI
    2. Continue (Continue-AI/continue)
    3. Open Interpreter (OpenInterpreter/open-interpreter)
    4. smol-developer (smol-ai/smol-developer)
    5. aider (paul-gauthier/aider)
    6. Shell Genie (ashishb/shell-genie)
    7. GPT-CLI (mshumer/gpt-cli)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents?
    pass
    AI did not name bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bradAGI/awesome-cli-coding-agents — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite