RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

renatoasse/opensquad

Default branch master · commit 454d73a6 · scanned 5/20/2026, 12:17:00 PM

GitHub: 1,715 stars · 453 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface renatoasse/opensquad, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the text of the MIT License.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a concise English summary to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README starts in Portuguese after the H1.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert the following line immediately after the '# opensquad' title in the README:
A multi-agent orchestration framework to create collaborative AI agent squads directly from your IDE.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface renatoasse/opensquad
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CrewAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 2×
  3. Haystack · recommended 2×
  4. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  5. Open Interpreter · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up a team of AI agents for collaborative task automation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. CrewAI
    3. LangChain
    4. Open Interpreter
    5. BabyAGI
    6. Haystack
    7. Microsoft AutoGen

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named renatoasse/opensquad. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks allow orchestrating multiple AI agents with natural language instructions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGen
    3. CrewAI
    4. Haystack
    5. LlamaIndex

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named renatoasse/opensquad. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of renatoasse/opensquad?
    pass
    AI named renatoasse/opensquad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts renatoasse/opensquad in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named renatoasse/opensquad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo renatoasse/opensquad solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named renatoasse/opensquad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of renatoasse/opensquad. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/renatoasse/opensquad.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/renatoasse/opensquad)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/renatoasse/opensquad"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/renatoasse/opensquad.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

renatoasse/opensquad — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite