RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wdcpclover/ai4paper

Default branch main · commit 86beac63 · scanned 6/28/2026, 3:06:35 AM

GitHub: 1,987 stars · 34 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wdcpclover/ai4paper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Explicitly state AI4Paper is a standalone platform in README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    让天下没有难读的 Paper，让天下没有难做的科研。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    让天下没有难读的 Paper，让天下没有难做的科研。AI4Paper 是一个集文献搜索、翻译、阅读辅助、综述生成于一体的**独立 AI 科研平台**，深度集成 Zotero。
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, zotero, research-assistant, literature-review, pdf-translation, academic-tools, knowledge-base, paper-writing, generative-ai
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the root directory of the repository, choosing a standard open-source license such as MIT or Apache-2.0.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wdcpclover/ai4paper
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 2×
  2. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  3. ResearchRabbit · recommended 2×
  4. Connected Papers · recommended 2×
  5. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI assistant to streamline academic paper search, translation, and review generation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. ResearchRabbit
    4. DeepL Pro
    5. ChatGPT Plus
    6. Claude 3 Opus
    7. Connected Papers
    8. Semantic Scholar

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named wdcpclover/ai4paper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI platforms can automatically generate literature reviews from keywords with source traceability?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. Connected Papers
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. ResearchRabbit
    6. ChatGPT
    7. Google Gemini Advanced

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named wdcpclover/ai4paper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wdcpclover/ai4paper?
    pass
    AI did not name wdcpclover/ai4paper — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wdcpclover/ai4paper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wdcpclover/ai4paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wdcpclover/ai4paper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wdcpclover/ai4paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wdcpclover/ai4paper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wdcpclover/ai4paper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wdcpclover/ai4paper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wdcpclover/ai4paper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wdcpclover/ai4paper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wdcpclover/ai4paper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
wdcpclover/ai4paper — RepoGEO report