RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook

Default branch main · commit d4a413b7 · scanned 5/10/2026, 1:52:10 PM

GitHub: 1,087 stars · 111 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify 'Claude Code' is an AI assistant and this is a plugin system

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A collection of commands, roles, and automation scripts for Claude Code.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A collection of commands, roles, and automation scripts to extend and customize the Claude Code AI programming assistant.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT License) in the repository root to clearly define how others can use and contribute to the project.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL (e.g., the repository URL itself, or a dedicated project page if one exists) to the 'Homepage' field in the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. Cursor · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 2×
  4. Tabnine · recommended 1×
  5. CodeWhisperer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate common coding tasks using an AI programming assistant?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. CodeWhisperer
    4. Cursor
    5. JetBrains AI Assistant
    6. Google Gemini
    7. OpenAI API

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for ways to customize or extend my AI coding assistant's functionality with custom commands.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. VS Code
    3. Continue
    4. CodeGPT
    5. GitHub Copilot
    6. OpenAI API
    7. Azure OpenAI Service
    8. JetBrains IDEs

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook?
    pass
    AI did not name wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite