RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

P4nda0s/reverse-skills

Default branch main · commit a2baa31c · scanned 6/20/2026, 8:32:47 AM

GitHub: 1,339 stars · 184 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface P4nda0s/reverse-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to clarify its role as an AI assistant skill set

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 逆向工程技能集 (Reverse Engineering Skills)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Reverse Engineering Skills for AI Assistants (Claude Code Skills Plugin)
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization and discoverability

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    reverse-engineering, ai-assistant, claude-code-skills, ida-pro, ghidra, frida, mobile-security, binary-analysis, exploit-development, security-research
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file with the MIT license text

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root containing the full text of the MIT License.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface P4nda0s/reverse-skills
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
IDA Pro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. IDA Pro · recommended 2×
  2. Ghidra · recommended 1×
  3. Ghidra-GPT · recommended 1×
  4. Ghidra-Copilot · recommended 1×
  5. ReFirmLabs/binwalk · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I leverage AI to analyze and understand complex reverse engineered code?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IDA Pro
    2. Ghidra
    3. Ghidra-GPT
    4. Ghidra-Copilot
    5. Binwalk (ReFirmLabs/binwalk)
    6. CodeQL (github/codeql)
    7. ChatGPT
    8. GPT-4
    9. DeepCode
    10. Snyk Code AI Engine
    11. Panda (panda-re/panda)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named P4nda0s/reverse-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help with mobile application unpacking and dynamic analysis for security audits?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Frida (frida/frida)
    2. objection (sensepost/objection)
    3. MobSF (MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF)
    4. Xposed Framework (rovo89/Xposed)
    5. Cydia Substrate
    6. Burp Suite Professional
    7. Ghidra (NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra)
    8. IDA Pro
    9. Android Debug Bridge (ADB)
    10. Xcode

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named P4nda0s/reverse-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of P4nda0s/reverse-skills?
    pass
    AI named P4nda0s/reverse-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts P4nda0s/reverse-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named P4nda0s/reverse-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo P4nda0s/reverse-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name P4nda0s/reverse-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of P4nda0s/reverse-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/P4nda0s/reverse-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/P4nda0s/reverse-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/P4nda0s/reverse-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/P4nda0s/reverse-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

P4nda0s/reverse-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite