RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

sligter/LandPPT

Default branch master · commit 5554f3da · scanned 5/19/2026, 2:37:05 PM

GitHub: 3,249 stars · 437 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface sligter/LandPPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a prominent English summary to the main README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The main README starts with a Chinese title and links to a separate English README_EN.md, but lacks an immediate English summary.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following text at the very top of the main README.md, before any Chinese content or links:

"LandPPT is an AI-driven platform that automatically transforms document content into professional, high-quality presentation slides. It leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate outlines, smart image matching, speech scripts, and offers rich templates for a comprehensive AI-powered PPT creation experience."
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a clear statement in the '项目简介' (Project Introduction) or '许可证' (License) section of the README, specifying the exact license(s) under which the project is distributed, for example: '本项目采用 [Your Specific License Name(s)] 许可证。详情请参阅 LICENSE 文件。' (This project is licensed under [Your Specific License Name(s)]. See the LICENSE file for details.)
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with more specific keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, llm, ppt
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, llm, ppt, presentation-generator, ai-presentations, powerpoint-automation, document-to-ppt, speech-generation, smart-image-matching

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface sligter/LandPPT
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Gamma
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Gamma · recommended 2×
  2. Tome · recommended 2×
  3. Beautiful.ai · recommended 2×
  4. Plus AI for Google Slides · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Copilot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically transform document content into professional, AI-generated presentation slides?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gamma
    2. Tome
    3. Beautiful.ai
    4. Plus AI for Google Slides
    5. Microsoft Copilot
    6. Simplified
    7. Designs.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named sligter/LandPPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an intelligent platform to create high-quality presentations with smart image matching and speech generation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Beautiful.ai
    2. Gamma
    3. Canva
    4. Tome
    5. PowerPoint
    6. Google Slides

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named sligter/LandPPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of sligter/LandPPT?
    pass
    AI did not name sligter/LandPPT — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts sligter/LandPPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named sligter/LandPPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo sligter/LandPPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name sligter/LandPPT — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of sligter/LandPPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/sligter/LandPPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/sligter/LandPPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/sligter/LandPPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/sligter/LandPPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

sligter/LandPPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite