RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

p-org/P

Default branch master · commit f929e518 · scanned 5/13/2026, 3:16:44 AM

GitHub: 3,609 stars · 217 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface p-org/P, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to be more specific about 'P'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The P programming language.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    P is a state machine-based programming language for formally modeling, specifying, and verifying complex distributed systems.
  • highreadme#2
    Add a clear positioning statement in the README's opening

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    P is a state machine based programming language for formally modeling and specifying complex distributed systems. Unlike general-purpose programming languages, P is purpose-built for formal verification and systematic testing of concurrent and distributed system designs.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics to reinforce P's domain

    Why:

    CURRENT
    asynchronous, distributed-systems, event-driven, formal-methods, formal-verification, model-checking, p, programming-language, state-machine, systematic-testing
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    asynchronous, distributed-systems, event-driven, formal-methods, formal-verification, model-checking, p, programming-language, state-machine, systematic-testing, domain-specific-language, dsl, formal-specification

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface p-org/P
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
TLA+
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. TLA+ · recommended 1×
  2. TLC · recommended 1×
  3. TLAPS · recommended 1×
  4. PlusCal · recommended 1×
  5. Spin · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to formally verify correctness of distributed system designs using state machines?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TLA+
    2. TLC
    3. TLAPS
    4. PlusCal
    5. Spin
    6. APALACHE
    7. Coq
    8. Isabelle/HOL
    9. NuSMV

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named p-org/P. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What programming language helps model and analyze asynchronous state machine systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Erlang/Elixir
    2. Akka
    3. Go
    4. Rust
    5. actix-web
    6. riker
    7. Python
    8. asyncio
    9. transitions

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named p-org/P. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of p-org/P?
    pass
    AI did not name p-org/P — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts p-org/P in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named p-org/P explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo p-org/P solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name p-org/P — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of p-org/P. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/p-org/P.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/p-org/P)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/p-org/P"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/p-org/P.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

p-org/P — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
p-org/P — RepoGEO report