RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wm94i/Work_Review

Default branch main · commit f9b8939d · scanned 6/17/2026, 7:21:52 PM

GitHub: 1,338 stars · 81 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wm94i/Work_Review, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Explicitly state 'desktop application' in the README's opening tagline

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">
  <strong>A personal, local-first work activity log and review tool.</strong>
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">
  <strong>Work Review is a personal, local-first desktop application for logging and reviewing your work activity.</strong>
</p>
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root. Choose a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) and paste its full text into this file.
  • mediumabout#3
    Update the repository's 'About' description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Automatically tracks which apps you used, which websites you visited, and how much time you spent in each app throughout the day.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A local-first desktop app that automatically tracks your app usage, website visits, and time spent, helping you review and report your daily work activity.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wm94i/Work_Review
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
RescueTime
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. RescueTime · recommended 2×
  2. ManicTime · recommended 2×
  3. Toggl Track · recommended 2×
  4. Timeular · recommended 2×
  5. DeskTime · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically log my daily computer activity for work reports?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RescueTime
    2. ManicTime
    3. Toggl Track
    4. Timeular
    5. DeskTime
    6. Hubstaff

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named wm94i/Work_Review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a local-first, privacy-focused tool to track my daily work activities.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ActivityWatch
    2. RescueTime
    3. ManicTime
    4. Toggl Track
    5. Timeular
    6. VS Code
    7. Sublime Text
    8. Obsidian
    9. Notepad
    10. TextEdit

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named wm94i/Work_Review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wm94i/Work_Review?
    pass
    AI did not name wm94i/Work_Review — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wm94i/Work_Review in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wm94i/Work_Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wm94i/Work_Review solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wm94i/Work_Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wm94i/Work_Review. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wm94i/Work_Review.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wm94i/Work_Review)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wm94i/Work_Review"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wm94i/Work_Review.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wm94i/Work_Review — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite