RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

udecode/dotai

Default branch main · commit 031c2ad6 · scanned 5/20/2026, 5:22:55 AM

GitHub: 1,154 stars · 81 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface udecode/dotai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state the project's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with `# dotai` followed by `## Install`.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following sentence immediately after `# dotai`: `Dotai is a development toolkit providing plugins and commands to enhance AI agent capabilities and workflows, particularly for Claude.`
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, claude-code, codex, cursor
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following topics to the existing ones: `ai-agents`, `claude-plugins`, `llm-tools`, `developer-tools`, `agent-workflow`, `ai-debugging`.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface udecode/dotai
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. Haystack · recommended 1×
  4. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  5. BabyAGI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good development toolkits for enhancing AI agent capabilities and workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. AutoGPT
    5. BabyAGI
    6. OpenAI API
    7. Anthropic Claude
    8. Google Gemini
    9. Weights & Biases
    10. TaskingAI

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named udecode/dotai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a debugging framework or TDD workflow for building robust AI assistant plugins.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Pytest
    2. pytest-mock
    3. pytest-vcr
    4. Jest
    5. jest-mock
    6. nock
    7. testing
    8. httptest
    9. testify/mock
    10. Playwright
    11. Selenium
    12. Postman
    13. Insomnia

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named udecode/dotai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of udecode/dotai?
    pass
    AI named udecode/dotai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts udecode/dotai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named udecode/dotai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo udecode/dotai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named udecode/dotai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of udecode/dotai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/udecode/dotai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/udecode/dotai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/udecode/dotai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/udecode/dotai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

udecode/dotai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
udecode/dotai — RepoGEO report