RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NomaDamas/slides-grab

Default branch main · commit dceab139 · scanned 6/6/2026, 7:16:55 PM

GitHub: 818 stars · 84 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NomaDamas/slides-grab, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's core value proposition

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">Select context for agents directly from AI-generated HTML slides</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Replace the current `<p align="center">Select context for agents directly from AI-generated HTML slides</p>` with: `<p align="center">slides-grab is the best open-source harness, editor, and linter for generating and editing HTML slides using AI agents like Claude Code/Codex, offering a powerful alternative to traditional presentation software.</p>`
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics to reflect AI and HTML aspects

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ppt, slides, slideshow
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-powered-presentations, html-slides, ai-agents, presentation-editor, generative-ai, slides, slideshow
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, '## Why slides-grab? (Compared to X, Y, Z)' or '## Alternatives', that highlights its unique approach (AI-editable HTML, agent harness) compared to traditional presentation tools or other HTML slide frameworks like Gamma, Beautiful.ai, Reveal.js, or Marp.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NomaDamas/slides-grab
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Gamma
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Gamma · recommended 1×
  2. Beautiful.ai · recommended 1×
  3. Tome · recommended 1×
  4. Canva · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft PowerPoint · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for generating and editing presentation slides using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gamma
    2. Beautiful.ai
    3. Tome
    4. Canva
    5. Microsoft PowerPoint
    6. Microsoft 365 Copilot
    7. Google Slides
    8. Duet AI

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named NomaDamas/slides-grab. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build interactive HTML presentations that are easily editable by AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Reveal.js
    2. Marp
    3. Astro
    4. Next.js
    5. SvelteKit
    6. Quarto

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named NomaDamas/slides-grab. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NomaDamas/slides-grab?
    pass
    AI named NomaDamas/slides-grab explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NomaDamas/slides-grab in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NomaDamas/slides-grab explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NomaDamas/slides-grab solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NomaDamas/slides-grab explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NomaDamas/slides-grab. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NomaDamas/slides-grab.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NomaDamas/slides-grab)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NomaDamas/slides-grab"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NomaDamas/slides-grab.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NomaDamas/slides-grab — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite