RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager

Default branch main · commit 6f8fb5f0 · scanned 6/8/2026, 4:17:00 AM

GitHub: 841 stars · 180 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README H1 and add an English tagline

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # CPA-Codex-Manager
一款专为 OpenAI 账号池设计的高性能管理面板，集成全自动批量注册、CLIProxyAPI 平台账号池实时监控与智能维护系统。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # CPA-Codex-Manager: OpenAI Account Pool Management Panel
A high-performance management panel designed for OpenAI account pools, integrating fully automatic batch registration, CLIProxyAPI platform account pool real-time monitoring, and intelligent maintenance functions.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    openai, account-management, api-management, batch-registration, account-pool, monitoring, fastapi, python
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Okta
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Okta · recommended 2×
  2. Auth0 · recommended 2×
  3. GitLab CI/CD · recommended 2×
  4. GitHub Actions · recommended 2×
  5. hashicorp/vault · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a system to automate the creation and health checks of AI service accounts.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HashiCorp Vault (hashicorp/vault)
    2. AWS IAM Access Analyzer
    3. GCP Security Command Center
    4. Azure Security Center
    5. Okta
    6. Auth0
    7. Ping Identity
    8. Ansible (ansible/ansible)
    9. Puppet (puppetlabs/puppet)
    10. Chef (chef/chef)
    11. Kubernetes Service Accounts
    12. Open Policy Agent (OPA) (open-policy-agent/opa)
    13. boto3 (boto/boto3)
    14. google-cloud-sdk
    15. azure-cli (azure/azure-cli)
    16. Jenkins (jenkinsci/jenkins)
    17. GitLab CI/CD
    18. GitHub Actions
    19. Terraform (hashicorp/terraform)
    20. Pulumi (pulumi/pulumi)

    AI recommended 20 alternatives but never named Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help automatically replenish and maintain a pool of AI model access tokens?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HashiCorp Vault
    2. AWS Secrets Manager
    3. Azure Key Vault
    4. Google Secret Manager
    5. Kubernetes Secrets
    6. External Secrets Operator
    7. Doppler
    8. GitHub Actions
    9. GitLab CI/CD
    10. Jenkins
    11. Auth0
    12. Okta

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager?
    pass
    AI named Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Maoleio/CPA-Codex-Manager — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite