RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

memodb-io/memobase

Default branch main · commit 358c16bb · scanned 6/25/2026, 5:57:49 AM

GitHub: 2,767 stars · 219 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface memodb-io/memobase, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition core value proposition for LLM user memory at the top of README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README excerpt places the core description after badges and a "News" section.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the sentence "Memobase is a **user profile-based memory system** designed to bring long-term user memory to your LLM applications." to be the very first paragraph immediately following the `<h1>Memobase</h1>` title, before any badges or news.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific LLM personalization and agent memory topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-companion, ai-memory, chatgpt, llm-application, llm-memory, long-term-memory, memory, rag, retrieval, user-memory
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-companion, ai-memory, chatgpt, llm-application, llm-memory, long-term-memory, memory, rag, retrieval, user-memory, llm-personalization, chatbot-memory, agent-memory, user-profiles
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a comparison section to differentiate from common alternatives

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, e.g., "## Memobase vs. Other Memory Solutions" or "## Why Memobase?", that explicitly compares its "user profile-based long-term memory" approach to generic vector databases (like Pinecone, Weaviate) and LLM orchestration frameworks (like LangChain, LlamaIndex), highlighting its unique focus on user profiles and personalized experiences.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface memodb-io/memobase
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Pinecone
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Pinecone · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. Weaviate · recommended 1×
  4. Chroma · recommended 1×
  5. Qdrant · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I implement long-term, user-specific memory for my AI chatbot applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. Pinecone
    3. Weaviate
    4. Chroma
    5. Qdrant
    6. Redis
    7. RediSearch
    8. PostgreSQL
    9. pgvector
    10. MongoDB
    11. Firebase Firestore
    12. Realtime Database
    13. SQLAlchemy
    14. SQLite
    15. MySQL

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named memodb-io/memobase. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help LLMs remember user interactions and personalize future responses?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. Pinecone
    4. Weaviate (weaviate/weaviate)
    5. Redis (redis/redis)
    6. Faiss (facebookresearch/faiss)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named memodb-io/memobase. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of memodb-io/memobase?
    pass
    AI named memodb-io/memobase explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts memodb-io/memobase in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named memodb-io/memobase explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo memodb-io/memobase solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named memodb-io/memobase explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of memodb-io/memobase. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/memodb-io/memobase.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/memodb-io/memobase)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/memodb-io/memobase"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/memodb-io/memobase.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

memodb-io/memobase — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite