RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

openclaw/acpx

Default branch main · commit c26e99c8 · scanned 5/18/2026, 6:01:57 PM

GitHub: 2,688 stars · 262 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface openclaw/acpx, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition core value proposition to the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # acpx

[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/acpx)
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/acpx)
[](https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[](https://nodejs.org)

> ⚠️ `acpx` is in alpha and the CLI/runtime interfaces are likely to change. Anything you build downstream of this might break until it stabilizes.

> ACP coverage status: see [ACP Spec Coverage Roadmap](docs/2026-02-19-acp-coverage-roadmap.md).

Your agents love acpx! 🤖❤️ They hate having to scrape characters from a PTY session 😤

`acpx` is a headless CLI client for the Agent Client Protocol (ACP), so AI agents and orchestrators can talk to coding agents over a structured protocol instead of PTY scraping.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # acpx

`acpx` is a headless CLI client for the Agent Client Protocol (ACP), so AI agents and orchestrators can talk to coding agents over a structured protocol instead of PTY scraping.

Your agents love acpx! 🤖❤️ They hate having to scrape characters from a PTY session 😤

[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/acpx)
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/acpx)
[](https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[](https://nodejs.org)

> ⚠️ `acpx` is in alpha and the CLI/runtime interfaces are likely to change. Anything you build downstream of this might break until it stabilizes.

> ACP coverage status: see [ACP Spec Coverage Roadmap](docs/2026-02-19-acp-coverage-roadmap.md).
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add broader, relevant topics to improve category matching

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agentclientprotocol
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentclientprotocol, ai-agents, cli-tools, agent-communication, protocol-client, headless-client
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why acpx? (Compared to generic CLIs or IPC)

Unlike general-purpose CLI frameworks (like Click or Typer) or raw inter-process communication solutions (like gRPC or Kafka), `acpx` is specifically designed for *AI agent-to-agent communication* using the Agent Client Protocol. It provides stateful, multi-turn sessions and structured command surfaces tailored for automated interactions, rather than human-centric CLI building or low-level network messaging.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface openclaw/acpx
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
gRPC
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. gRPC · recommended 2×
  2. Click · recommended 1×
  3. Typer · recommended 1×
  4. argparse · recommended 1×
  5. Commander.js · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI agents communicate with coding agents using a structured CLI protocol?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Click
    2. Typer
    3. argparse
    4. Commander.js
    5. Cobra
    6. Bash
    7. Zsh
    8. JSON-RPC
    9. gRPC

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named openclaw/acpx. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools replace PTY scraping for agent-to-agent communication in CLI environments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. gRPC
    2. Apache Kafka
    3. RabbitMQ
    4. ZeroMQ
    5. requests
    6. axios
    7. curl
    8. paramiko
    9. ssh2

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named openclaw/acpx. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of openclaw/acpx?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/acpx explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts openclaw/acpx in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/acpx explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo openclaw/acpx solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/acpx explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of openclaw/acpx. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/openclaw/acpx.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/openclaw/acpx)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/openclaw/acpx"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/openclaw/acpx.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

openclaw/acpx — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite