RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

google/BIG-bench

Default branch main · commit 092b196c · scanned 6/27/2026, 12:32:56 PM

GitHub: 3,248 stars · 615 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface google/BIG-bench, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    large-language-models, llm-evaluation, benchmark, ai, machine-learning, nlp, language-models, evaluation-framework
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's opening sentence to emphasize its role as an LLM evaluation platform

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The Beyond the Imitation Game Benchmark (BIG-bench) is a *collaborative* benchmark intended to probe large language models and extrapolate their future capabilities.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    BIG-bench (Beyond the Imitation Game Benchmark) is a comprehensive, collaborative evaluation platform designed to rigorously benchmark and extrapolate the capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a "Comparison with Alternatives" section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison with Alternatives
    
    BIG-bench stands apart from other LLM evaluation frameworks like EleutherAI's LM Evaluation Harness or OpenAI Evals by offering a uniquely broad and diverse collection of over 200 tasks. Our collaborative, community-driven approach focuses on probing emergent abilities and guiding future research, rather than solely providing standard performance metrics. This extensive task diversity allows for a deeper exploration of model capabilities beyond typical benchmarks.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface google/BIG-bench
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI Evals
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI Evals · recommended 2×
  2. EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness · recommended 1×
  3. Hugging Face Evaluate library · recommended 1×
  4. HELM · recommended 1×
  5. LangChain · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I effectively benchmark and evaluate the capabilities of large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness (EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness)
    2. OpenAI Evals
    3. Hugging Face Evaluate library
    4. HELM
    5. LangChain
    6. DeepEval
    7. Scale AI
    8. Appen

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named google/BIG-bench. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What platforms offer diverse tasks for probing and comparing large language model performance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Datasets and Evaluate
    2. EleutherAI's LM Evaluation Harness
    3. OpenAI Evals
    4. BigBench
    5. MMLU
    6. GLUE and SuperGLUE

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named google/BIG-bench. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of google/BIG-bench?
    pass
    AI named google/BIG-bench explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts google/BIG-bench in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named google/BIG-bench explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo google/BIG-bench solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named google/BIG-bench explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of google/BIG-bench. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/google/BIG-bench.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/google/BIG-bench)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/google/BIG-bench"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/google/BIG-bench.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

google/BIG-bench — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite