RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Tencent/AICGSecEval

Default branch master · commit 94428ebf · scanned 6/6/2026, 5:27:11 PM

GitHub: 643 stars · 108 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Tencent/AICGSecEval, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear H1 title to the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1 align="center"></h1>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1 align="center">A.S.E (AICGSecEval): Project-Level Benchmark for AI-Generated Code Security Evaluation</h1>
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to highlight AI-generated code security evaluation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, aigc, benchmark, codesecurity, llm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, aigc, benchmark, codesecurity, llm, ai-code-security, llm-security, security-evaluation-framework
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify the project's license(s) in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section or line in the README, e.g., "## License\nThis project is licensed under [Specify License Name(s) Here]. Please refer to the LICENSE file for full details."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Tencent/AICGSecEval
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Snyk Code
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Snyk Code · recommended 2×
  2. Semgrep · recommended 2×
  3. OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) · recommended 2×
  4. GitHub Advanced Security (CodeQL) · recommended 1×
  5. Veracode Static Analysis · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to benchmark the security of AI-generated code in a project?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snyk Code
    2. GitHub Advanced Security (CodeQL)
    3. Semgrep
    4. OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)
    5. Veracode Static Analysis
    6. DeepCode AI
    7. Contrast Security (Contrast Assess)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Tencent/AICGSecEval. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for evaluating security vulnerabilities in code generated by large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Semgrep
    2. CodeQL
    3. Snyk Code
    4. Checkmarx SAST
    5. OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)
    6. Bandit
    7. ESLint (with security plugins)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Tencent/AICGSecEval. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Tencent/AICGSecEval?
    pass
    AI named Tencent/AICGSecEval explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Tencent/AICGSecEval in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Tencent/AICGSecEval explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Tencent/AICGSecEval solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Tencent/AICGSecEval explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Tencent/AICGSecEval. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Tencent/AICGSecEval.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Tencent/AICGSecEval)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Tencent/AICGSecEval"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Tencent/AICGSecEval.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Tencent/AICGSecEval — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
Tencent/AICGSecEval — RepoGEO report