RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

badlogic/claude-commands

Default branch main · commit 5aa5802b · scanned 6/8/2026, 12:57:42 PM

GitHub: 506 stars · 31 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface badlogic/claude-commands, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository's 'About' description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Global Claude Code commands and workflows
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Human-agent collaborative workflows for transforming vague todos into implemented features using Claude AI and Git.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, git-workflows, todo-management, developer-tools, claude-ai, prompt-engineering, code-generation, human-in-the-loop, feature-development
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of the MIT License (or another suitable open-source license).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface badlogic/claude-commands
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  3. Claude · recommended 1×
  4. Google Gemini Advanced · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Copilot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    AI assistant for breaking down vague project ideas into concrete implementation steps?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Claude
    3. Google Gemini Advanced
    4. Microsoft Copilot
    5. Perplexity AI
    6. GitHub Copilot

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named badlogic/claude-commands. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for managing AI agent contributions to code within isolated git development environments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitLab
    2. GitHub
    3. GitHub Actions
    4. GitHub Codespaces
    5. GitHub Copilot
    6. Azure DevOps
    7. Azure Repos
    8. Azure Pipelines
    9. Azure Dev Boxes
    10. Gerrit Code Review
    11. AWS CodeCommit
    12. AWS CodeBuild
    13. AWS CodePipeline
    14. AWS Cloud9
    15. EC2 instances
    16. JetBrains Space

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named badlogic/claude-commands. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of badlogic/claude-commands?
    pass
    AI did not name badlogic/claude-commands — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts badlogic/claude-commands in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named badlogic/claude-commands explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo badlogic/claude-commands solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named badlogic/claude-commands explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of badlogic/claude-commands. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/badlogic/claude-commands.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/badlogic/claude-commands)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/badlogic/claude-commands"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/badlogic/claude-commands.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

badlogic/claude-commands — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite