RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

showlab/Paper2Video

Default branch main · commit 47beb503 · scanned 6/25/2026, 8:02:58 AM

GitHub: 2,319 stars · 327 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface showlab/Paper2Video, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    video-generation, scientific-papers, academic-research, ai, deep-learning, presentation-tools, summarization, research-dissemination
  • highreadme#2
    Add a concise value proposition statement to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with the title and a descriptive subtitle, followed by author credits and links.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert the following sentence immediately after the main title/subtitle, before author credits and links: "Paper2Video is an innovative framework that automates the creation of engaging video presentations directly from scientific papers, streamlining academic dissemination."
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a section differentiating Paper2Video from general AI video tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., "## Why Paper2Video? (vs. general video tools)" or "## Comparison to General AI Video Tools", explaining how it differs by focusing specifically on scientific papers, e.g., "Unlike general video generation platforms or large language models, Paper2Video is specifically designed to process and transform academic research papers into structured, narrated video presentations, handling content extraction, summarization, and multimedia generation tailored for scientific communication."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface showlab/Paper2Video
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Synthesia
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Synthesia · recommended 2×
  2. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  3. Claude · recommended 2×
  4. Descript · recommended 2×
  5. Canva · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically generate a video presentation from a scientific paper?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Synthesia
    2. ChatGPT
    3. Claude
    4. Pictory
    5. Descript
    6. Canva
    7. ElevenLabs
    8. Google Text-to-Speech
    9. PowerPoint
    10. Google Slides
    11. OBS Studio
    12. Loom
    13. Gemini

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named showlab/Paper2Video. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help automate creating video summaries for academic research papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Synthesia
    2. ElevenLabs
    3. ChatGPT
    4. Claude
    5. Gemini
    6. DeepL Write
    7. Grammarly Premium
    8. Descript
    9. Canva
    10. Adobe Premiere Pro
    11. DaVinci Resolve

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named showlab/Paper2Video. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of showlab/Paper2Video?
    pass
    AI named showlab/Paper2Video explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts showlab/Paper2Video in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named showlab/Paper2Video explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo showlab/Paper2Video solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named showlab/Paper2Video explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of showlab/Paper2Video. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/showlab/Paper2Video.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/showlab/Paper2Video)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/showlab/Paper2Video"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/showlab/Paper2Video.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

showlab/Paper2Video — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite