REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
PreferredAI/cornac
Default branch master · commit 21f6a6ce · scanned 5/16/2026, 4:57:00 PM
GitHub: 1,041 stars · 166 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface PreferredAI/cornac, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highreadme#1Clarify README's opening to emphasize building multimodal recommender systems
Why:
CURRENT**Cornac** is a comparative framework for multimodal recommender systems. It focuses on making it **convenient** to work with models leveraging **auxiliary data** (e.g., item descriptive text and image, social network, etc).
COPY-PASTE FIX**Cornac** is a comprehensive framework for **building, evaluating, and comparing** multimodal recommender systems. It provides **convenient tools** for developing models that leverage **diverse auxiliary data** like item descriptive text, images, or social networks.
- mediumreadme#2Add a dedicated 'Multimodal Capabilities' section to the README
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX## Multimodal Capabilities Cornac excels at integrating diverse auxiliary data sources into recommendation models, including: * **Textual Data:** Item descriptions, reviews, tags. * **Visual Data:** Product images, user avatars. * **Social Network Data:** User connections, interactions. * **Temporal Data:** Time-aware interactions.
- lowtopics#3Expand topics with more specific multimodal and deep learning keywords
Why:
CURRENTcollaborative-filtering, matrix-factorization, multimodal-learning, multimodality, recommendation-algorithms, recommendation-engine, recommendation-system, recommender-system
COPY-PASTE FIXcollaborative-filtering, matrix-factorization, multimodal-learning, multimodality, recommendation-algorithms, recommendation-engine, recommendation-system, recommender-system, deep-learning-recommendation, hybrid-recommender-systems, text-recommendation, image-recommendation
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- PyTorch · recommended 1×
- TensorFlow · recommended 1×
- huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
- pytorch/vision · recommended 1×
- tf.keras.applications · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYHow to build a recommendation engine that uses both text and image data?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
- torchvision (pytorch/vision)
- tf.keras.applications
- Faiss (facebookresearch/faiss)
- Annoy (spotify/annoy)
- Weaviate (weaviate/weaviate)
- Pinecone
- Qdrant (qdrant/qdrant)
- LightFM (lyst/lightfm)
- Apache Spark MLlib
AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named PreferredAI/cornac. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat are good frameworks for evaluating and comparing different recommendation algorithms?you: #4AI recommended (in order):
- Surprise
- RecBole
- LightFM
- Cornac ← you
- LensKit
- Apache Mahout
- TensorFlow Recommenders (TFR)
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesspass
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of PreferredAI/cornac?passAI named PreferredAI/cornac explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts PreferredAI/cornac in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named PreferredAI/cornac explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo PreferredAI/cornac solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI named PreferredAI/cornac explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of PreferredAI/cornac. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/PreferredAI/cornac)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/PreferredAI/cornac"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/PreferredAI/cornac.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
PreferredAI/cornac — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite