RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

PreferredAI/cornac

Default branch master · commit 21f6a6ce · scanned 5/16/2026, 4:57:00 PM

GitHub: 1,041 stars · 166 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
64 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #4.0 when recommended
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface PreferredAI/cornac, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README's opening to emphasize building multimodal recommender systems

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **Cornac** is a comparative framework for multimodal recommender systems. It focuses on making it **convenient** to work with models leveraging **auxiliary data** (e.g., item descriptive text and image, social network, etc).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Cornac** is a comprehensive framework for **building, evaluating, and comparing** multimodal recommender systems. It provides **convenient tools** for developing models that leverage **diverse auxiliary data** like item descriptive text, images, or social networks.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a dedicated 'Multimodal Capabilities' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Multimodal Capabilities
    
    Cornac excels at integrating diverse auxiliary data sources into recommendation models, including:
    *   **Textual Data:** Item descriptions, reviews, tags.
    *   **Visual Data:** Product images, user avatars.
    *   **Social Network Data:** User connections, interactions.
    *   **Temporal Data:** Time-aware interactions.
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand topics with more specific multimodal and deep learning keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    collaborative-filtering, matrix-factorization, multimodal-learning, multimodality, recommendation-algorithms, recommendation-engine, recommendation-system, recommender-system
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    collaborative-filtering, matrix-factorization, multimodal-learning, multimodality, recommendation-algorithms, recommendation-engine, recommendation-system, recommender-system, deep-learning-recommendation, hybrid-recommender-systems, text-recommendation, image-recommendation

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface PreferredAI/cornac
Avg rank
#4.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
5%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
PyTorch
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. PyTorch · recommended 1×
  2. TensorFlow · recommended 1×
  3. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  4. pytorch/vision · recommended 1×
  5. tf.keras.applications · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build a recommendation engine that uses both text and image data?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PyTorch
    2. TensorFlow
    3. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    4. torchvision (pytorch/vision)
    5. tf.keras.applications
    6. Faiss (facebookresearch/faiss)
    7. Annoy (spotify/annoy)
    8. Weaviate (weaviate/weaviate)
    9. Pinecone
    10. Qdrant (qdrant/qdrant)
    11. LightFM (lyst/lightfm)
    12. Apache Spark MLlib

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named PreferredAI/cornac. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good frameworks for evaluating and comparing different recommendation algorithms?
    you: #4
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Surprise
    2. RecBole
    3. LightFM
    4. Cornac ← you
    5. LensKit
    6. Apache Mahout
    7. TensorFlow Recommenders (TFR)
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of PreferredAI/cornac?
    pass
    AI named PreferredAI/cornac explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts PreferredAI/cornac in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named PreferredAI/cornac explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo PreferredAI/cornac solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named PreferredAI/cornac explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of PreferredAI/cornac. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/PreferredAI/cornac.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/PreferredAI/cornac)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/PreferredAI/cornac"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/PreferredAI/cornac.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

PreferredAI/cornac — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite