RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

OpenBMB/VisCPM

Default branch main · commit d21f3ebd · scanned 5/19/2026, 10:58:20 AM

GitHub: 1,068 stars · 89 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface OpenBMB/VisCPM, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the root directory of the repository with the appropriate license text (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, or a custom license if applicable).
  • highreadme#2
    Refine README H1 for clearer English positioning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # VisCPM
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # VisCPM: Bilingual Multimodal LLM for Chat & Image Generation (Chinese & English)
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the official project homepage URL (e.g., `http://120.92.209.146/` or a more general project page) to the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface OpenBMB/VisCPM
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Stable Diffusion XL
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Stable Diffusion XL · recommended 2×
  2. Qwen-VL-Chat · recommended 1×
  3. CogVLM · recommended 1×
  4. LLaVA · recommended 1×
  5. MiniGPT-4 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source multimodal models support both English and Chinese for chat and image generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Qwen-VL-Chat
    2. CogVLM
    3. LLaVA
    4. MiniGPT-4
    5. InternLM-XComposer
    6. Stable Diffusion XL

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named OpenBMB/VisCPM. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a large model combining vision and language for bilingual conversational AI and image synthesis.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4o
    2. Google Gemini
    3. Llama 3
    4. Stable Diffusion XL
    5. DALL-E 3
    6. GPT-4
    7. Claude 3 Opus
    8. Mixtral 8x7B
    9. Claude 3 Haiku/Sonnet

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named OpenBMB/VisCPM. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of OpenBMB/VisCPM?
    pass
    AI named OpenBMB/VisCPM explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts OpenBMB/VisCPM in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named OpenBMB/VisCPM explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo OpenBMB/VisCPM solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named OpenBMB/VisCPM explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of OpenBMB/VisCPM. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenBMB/VisCPM.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenBMB/VisCPM)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenBMB/VisCPM"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenBMB/VisCPM.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

OpenBMB/VisCPM — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite