REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
vschiavoni/sgx-papers
Default branch master · commit 1cae8228 · scanned 6/3/2026, 1:21:44 AM
GitHub: 553 stars · 111 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface vschiavoni/sgx-papers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highreadme#1Emphasize the curated nature and value proposition in the README's opening
Why:
CURRENTA curated list of system papers using/about Intel SGX. I'll try to keep this list updated. I gladly accept PRs.
COPY-PASTE FIXThis repository provides a *curated and actively maintained list* of key research papers focused on Intel SGX. Unlike general search engines, it offers a pre-filtered, organized collection to help researchers, developers, and students quickly find relevant academic work on trusted execution environments.
- highlicense#2Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights
Why:
CURRENT(no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
COPY-PASTE FIXCreate a LICENSE file in the repository root containing the text for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY-4.0), which is suitable for datasets and curated content.
- mediumhomepage#3Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata
Why:
CURRENT(none)
COPY-PASTE FIXhttps://github.com/vschiavoni/sgx-papers
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- ARM TrustZone · recommended 2×
- Google Scholar · recommended 1×
- Intel SGX · recommended 1×
- ACM Digital Library · recommended 1×
- CCS · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhere can I find academic papers on trusted execution environments and secure enclaves?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Google Scholar
- Intel SGX
- ARM TrustZone
- ACM Digital Library
- CCS
- S&P (Oakland Security)
- USENIX Security
- NDSS
- ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS)
- IEEE Xplore Digital Library
- IEEE S&P
- IEEE EuroS&P
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (TDSC)
- Cryptology ePrint Archive (IACR ePrint)
- arXiv
- USENIX Security Symposium
- IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Oakland)
- ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS)
- Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS)
- EuroS&P (IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy)
- ASIACCS (ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security)
AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named vschiavoni/sgx-papers. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYLooking for research on secure computing paradigms like confidential computing and hardware enclaves.you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Intel SGX (Software Guard Extensions)
- AMD SEV (Secure Encrypted Virtualization)
- Microsoft Azure Confidential Computing
- Google Confidential Computing (Confidential VMs)
- ARM TrustZone
- Open Enclave SDK
- MesaTEE (Memory-Safe Trusted Execution Environment)
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named vschiavoni/sgx-papers. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of vschiavoni/sgx-papers?passAI did not name vschiavoni/sgx-papers — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts vschiavoni/sgx-papers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named vschiavoni/sgx-papers explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo vschiavoni/sgx-papers solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name vschiavoni/sgx-papers — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of vschiavoni/sgx-papers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/vschiavoni/sgx-papers)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/vschiavoni/sgx-papers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/vschiavoni/sgx-papers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
vschiavoni/sgx-papers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite