RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents

Default branch main · commit c100577e · scanned 6/16/2026, 4:36:52 PM

GitHub: 504 stars · 87 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Reposition the About description to clarify 'pi' and its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Interactive subagents for pi — spawn, orchestrate, and manage sub-agent sessions in cmux terminals
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Orchestrate interactive sub-agent sessions for the 'pi' agent framework, managing them in multiplexer terminals like tmux or zellij. Enables non-blocking, concurrent execution of AI agent tasks.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
asyncio
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. asyncio · recommended 1×
  2. aiohttp · recommended 1×
  3. concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor · recommended 1×
  4. concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor · recommended 1×
  5. Celery · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to run multiple AI agent tasks concurrently without blocking the main process?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. asyncio
    2. aiohttp
    3. concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor
    4. concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor
    5. Celery
    6. Ray
    7. Dask
    8. Apache Kafka
    9. confluent-kafka-python
    10. multiprocessing

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a library to orchestrate and monitor interactive sub-processes in separate terminal panes.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. tmux (tmux/tmux)
    2. GNU Screen
    3. concurrently (kimmobrunfeldt/concurrently)
    4. Foreman (ddollar/foreman)
    5. Honcho (nickstenning/honcho)
    6. supervisord (Supervisor/supervisor)
    7. iTerm2 (gnachman/iTerm2)
    8. Windows Terminal (microsoft/terminal)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents?
    pass
    AI did not name HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite