REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

Default branch main · commit 88392cc1 · scanned 5/22/2026, 6:57:14 AM

GitHub: 1,124 stars · 2,321 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

22 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

1 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition README H1 and opening paragraph for academic LaTeX/R focus

Why:

CURRENT

# My Claude Code Setup

> **Actively maintained.** A summary of how I use Claude Code for academic work — slides, papers, data analysis, and more — packaged so you can fork it for your own research.

COPY-PASTE FIX

# Claude Code for Academics: LaTeX/Beamer + R Workflow Template

> **Actively maintained.** A ready-to-fork Claude Code template for academics using LaTeX/Beamer + R, designed for multi-agent review, quality gates, adversarial QA, and replication protocols. This setup helps you use Claude Code for academic work — slides, papers, data analysis, and more — packaged so you can fork it for your own research.

hightopics#2

Add specific topics to improve AI categorization

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

claude-code, ai-workflow, academic, latex, beamer, r, data-analysis, research-papers, multi-agent, quality-assurance, replication

mediumhomepage#3
Add the live site URL to the repository homepage field
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX
```
psantanna.com/claude-code-my-workflow
```

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

ChatGPT Plus

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

ChatGPT Plus · recommended 1×
Elicit · recommended 1×
Scite.ai · recommended 1×
Grammarly Business/Premium · recommended 1×
Copilot (Microsoft 365 Copilot) · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
AI assistant for academic writing, generating research papers, slides, and data analysis?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. ChatGPT Plus
2. Elicit
3. Scite.ai
4. Grammarly Business/Premium
5. Copilot (Microsoft 365 Copilot)
6. QuillBot
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Seeking AI workflow for LaTeX and R projects with built-in quality assurance and replication?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Quarto
2. R Markdown
3. knitr
4. rmarkdown
5. pandoc
6. testthat
7. tinytest
8. renv
9. Docker
10. Git
11. GitHub
12. GitLab
13. GitHub Actions
14. GitLab CI/CD
15. Podman
16. Overleaf
AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow?
pass
AI did not name pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI did not name pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite