RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mudler/LocalAGI

Default branch main · commit 37810d91 · scanned 5/30/2026, 6:46:48 AM

GitHub: 1,810 stars · 273 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mudler/LocalAGI, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, local-ai, privacy, self-hosted, llm, no-code, openai-api-compatible, agentic-ai, consumer-hardware, golang
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's main heading to clearly state its category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h3 align="center"><em>Your AI. Your Hardware. Your Rules</em></h3>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h3 align="center"><em>LocalAGI: Your Self-Hostable AI Agent Platform for Privacy and Flexibility</em></h3>
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a project homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/mudler/LocalAGI

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mudler/LocalAGI
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LM Studio
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LM Studio · recommended 2×
  2. Ollama · recommended 1×
  3. LocalAI · recommended 1×
  4. PrivateGPT · recommended 1×
  5. Jan · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to run AI agents locally on my own hardware for enhanced data privacy?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ollama
    2. LM Studio
    3. LocalAI
    4. PrivateGPT
    5. Jan
    6. text-generation-webui

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named mudler/LocalAGI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a self-hostable platform offering local AI agent APIs similar to OpenAI's.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    2. LM Studio
    3. LocalAI (go-skynet/LocalAI)
    4. vLLM (vllm-project/vllm)
    5. text-generation-webui (oobabooga/text-generation-webui)
    6. LiteLLM (BerriAI/litellm)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named mudler/LocalAGI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mudler/LocalAGI?
    pass
    AI named mudler/LocalAGI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mudler/LocalAGI in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mudler/LocalAGI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mudler/LocalAGI solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mudler/LocalAGI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mudler/LocalAGI. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mudler/LocalAGI.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mudler/LocalAGI)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mudler/LocalAGI"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mudler/LocalAGI.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mudler/LocalAGI — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite