RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

epiral/bb-browser

Default branch main · commit 7ceb9e9f · scanned 5/21/2026, 6:37:23 AM

GitHub: 5,373 stars · 530 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface epiral/bb-browser, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H3 to clarify core purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # bb-browser
    
    ### BadBoy Browser
    
    **Your browser is the API. No keys. No bots. No scrapers.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # bb-browser
    
    **Your browser is the API. CLI + MCP server for AI agents to control Chrome with your login state.**
    
    No keys. No bots. No scrapers.
  • hightopics#2
    Add descriptive topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, browser-automation, cli, generative-ai, large-language-models, agentic-ai, web-interface, chrome-automation
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## How bb-browser Compares to Playwright/Puppeteer/Selenium
    
    Unlike traditional browser automation tools, bb-browser focuses on enabling AI agents to interact with web applications using your existing, logged-in browser state, without requiring API keys or complex bot detection circumvention. It's designed for agentic use cases where the AI needs to act as *you*, rather than a generic bot.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface epiral/bb-browser
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Playwright
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Playwright · recommended 2×
  2. Puppeteer · recommended 2×
  3. Selenium · recommended 1×
  4. ChromeDriver · recommended 1×
  5. GeckoDriver · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI agents interact with web applications using my existing browser login state?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Selenium
    3. ChromeDriver
    4. GeckoDriver
    5. Puppeteer
    6. Tampermonkey
    7. Greasemonkey
    8. requests-html
    9. axios
    10. jsdom

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named epiral/bb-browser. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow AI to programmatically control a browser for tasks on sites without APIs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Puppeteer
    3. Selenium WebDriver
    4. Cypress
    5. Browserless
    6. Beautiful Soup
    7. requests
    8. httpx
    9. Scrapy

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named epiral/bb-browser. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of epiral/bb-browser?
    pass
    AI did not name epiral/bb-browser — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts epiral/bb-browser in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named epiral/bb-browser explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo epiral/bb-browser solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named epiral/bb-browser explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of epiral/bb-browser. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/epiral/bb-browser.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/epiral/bb-browser)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/epiral/bb-browser"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/epiral/bb-browser.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

epiral/bb-browser — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
epiral/bb-browser — RepoGEO report