RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ekwek1/soprano

Default branch main · commit 12fac06e · scanned 6/20/2026, 2:18:27 PM

GitHub: 1,238 stars · 105 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ekwek1/soprano, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Move core project definition to the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The 'Overview' section, which defines Soprano, appears after the 'News' section.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the entire 'Overview' section (starting with '**Soprano** is an ultra‑lightweight...') to be immediately after the main title and badges, before the 'News' section.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, after 'Usage', titled 'Comparison with Alternatives' or 'Why Soprano?'. This section should explicitly highlight Soprano's advantages (e.g., speed, on-device, lightweight, low latency) compared to common TTS models.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with more specific keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    text-to-speech, tts
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    text-to-speech, tts, on-device, real-time, low-latency, edge-ai, speech-synthesis

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ekwek1/soprano
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Coqui TTS
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Coqui TTS · recommended 2×
  2. Mozilla TTS · recommended 2×
  3. Bark · recommended 2×
  4. Piper · recommended 1×
  5. Rhasspy · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best options for real-time, high-fidelity text-to-speech generation on local devices?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Piper
    2. Coqui TTS
    3. Rhasspy
    4. Mozilla TTS
    5. Bark
    6. OpenVoice
    7. WhisperSpeech

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ekwek1/soprano. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an ultra-lightweight text-to-speech model with low latency for on-device inference.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Pico TTS
    2. eSpeak NG
    3. Mozilla TTS
    4. Coqui TTS
    5. Bark

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named ekwek1/soprano. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ekwek1/soprano?
    pass
    AI named ekwek1/soprano explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ekwek1/soprano in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ekwek1/soprano explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ekwek1/soprano solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ekwek1/soprano explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ekwek1/soprano. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ekwek1/soprano.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ekwek1/soprano)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ekwek1/soprano"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ekwek1/soprano.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ekwek1/soprano — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite