RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xindoo/agentic-design-patterns

Default branch main · commit effb52f1 · scanned 6/26/2026, 10:26:51 PM

GitHub: 6,376 stars · 888 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xindoo/agentic-design-patterns, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, agentic-ai, design-patterns, llm, large-language-models, translation, google-book, artificial-intelligence
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., LICENSE.md) in the repository root with the text of a permissive open-source license like MIT.
  • highreadme#3
    Reposition the README H1 to emphasize LLM agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Agentic Design Patterns（中文翻译项目）
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Agentic Design Patterns (LLM Agent设计模式中文翻译项目)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface xindoo/agentic-design-patterns
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AI Game Programming Wisdom
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AI Game Programming Wisdom · recommended 1×
  2. Programming Game AI By Example · recommended 1×
  3. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach · recommended 1×
  4. Game AI Pro · recommended 1×
  5. AAMAS · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find resources on fundamental design patterns for building AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AI Game Programming Wisdom
    2. Programming Game AI By Example
    3. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
    4. Game AI Pro
    5. AAMAS
    6. Behavior Trees for AI: How to Design and Implement AI for Games

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named xindoo/agentic-design-patterns. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are common architectural patterns for designing intelligent multi-agent systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jason
    2. AgentSpeak
    3. Mesa
    4. Subsumption Architecture
    5. JaCaMo
    6. SOAR
    7. ACT-R
    8. Moise
    9. JADE
    10. SPADE
    11. CArtAgO

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named xindoo/agentic-design-patterns. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xindoo/agentic-design-patterns?
    pass
    AI did not name xindoo/agentic-design-patterns — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts xindoo/agentic-design-patterns in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named xindoo/agentic-design-patterns explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo xindoo/agentic-design-patterns solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name xindoo/agentic-design-patterns — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xindoo/agentic-design-patterns. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xindoo/agentic-design-patterns.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xindoo/agentic-design-patterns)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xindoo/agentic-design-patterns"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xindoo/agentic-design-patterns.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xindoo/agentic-design-patterns — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite