RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

luongnv89/asm

Default branch main · commit e3e5619d · scanned 6/17/2026, 2:21:15 AM

GitHub: 603 stars · 45 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface luongnv89/asm, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify 'ASM' acronym in README to prevent misinterpretation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">
      Stop juggling skill directories across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, and 10+ other AI agents.<br/>
      <strong>agent-skill-manager</strong> (<code>asm</code>) gives you a single TUI and CLI to install, search, audit, and organize all your agent skills — everywhere.
    </p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">
      Stop juggling skill directories across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, and 10+ other AI agents.<br/>
      <strong>ASM (Agent Skill Manager)</strong> is *not* for assembly language; it gives you a single TUI and CLI to install, search, audit, and organize all your agent skills — everywhere.
    </p>
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics for AI skill management

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, aiagents, coding, skills
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, aiagents, coding, skills, skill-management, agent-skills, ai-agent-orchestration, skill-catalog, ai-tools
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to differentiate from generic tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Why ASM? (Comparison to X, Y, Z)' or 'How ASM Differs' that explains how `asm` is distinct from general AI frameworks (like LangChain, LlamaIndex) or development environments (like VS Code, Jupyter) by focusing specifically on *skill management* for *multiple* agents. This section should highlight that ASM is a *meta-tool* for managing skills across *different* agents, not an agent framework itself.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface luongnv89/asm
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
jupyter/notebook
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. jupyter/notebook · recommended 1×
  2. jupyter/jupyterlab · recommended 1×
  3. microsoft/vscode · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  5. Codeium · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I efficiently manage diverse skills for various AI coding assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jupyter Notebooks (jupyter/notebook)
    2. JupyterLab (jupyter/jupyterlab)
    3. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    4. GitHub Copilot
    5. Codeium
    6. Git (git/git)
    7. GitHub
    8. GitLab (gitlabhq/gitlabhq)
    9. Bitbucket
    10. Cookiecutter (cookiecutter/cookiecutter)
    11. MLflow (mlflow/mlflow)
    12. Docker (moby/moby)
    13. Podman (containers/podman)
    14. Confluence
    15. Notion
    16. Obsidian

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named luongnv89/asm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a centralized tool to organize and deploy skills for all my AI agents.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    4. OpenAI Assistants API
    5. Haystack
    6. Rasa

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named luongnv89/asm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of luongnv89/asm?
    pass
    AI named luongnv89/asm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts luongnv89/asm in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name luongnv89/asm — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo luongnv89/asm solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named luongnv89/asm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of luongnv89/asm. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/luongnv89/asm.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/luongnv89/asm)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/luongnv89/asm"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/luongnv89/asm.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

luongnv89/asm — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite