RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper

Default branch main · commit 64170d4d · scanned 5/22/2026, 3:36:53 PM

GitHub: 1,341 stars · 112 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to be more specific

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Idea2Paper Offical Demo
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AI-powered multi-agent system for transforming research ideas into structured scientific papers and proposals.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the project homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    http://paperbuild.cn

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. Elicit · recommended 2×
  3. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  4. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  5. QuillBot · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to generate structured scientific papers from initial research ideas?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Elicit
    3. Semantic Scholar
    4. Scite.ai
    5. QuillBot
    6. DeepL Write

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best AI tools for drafting and reviewing academic research proposals?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Elicit
    3. Scite.ai
    4. QuillBot
    5. Grammarly
    6. Semantic Scholar
    7. Consensus

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper?
    pass
    AI named AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

AgentAlphaAGI/Idea2Paper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite