RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/amplifier

Default branch main · commit b5008f26 · scanned 5/20/2026, 5:56:42 PM

GitHub: 3,091 stars · 256 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/amplifier, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise 'About' description emphasizing the modular platform

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A modular, extensible AI-powered platform for building custom development assistants and intelligent workflows, with a reference CLI implementation.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve AI categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-assistant, generative-ai, llm-development, cli-tool, modular-architecture, developer-tools, code-generation, extensibility
  • mediumreadme#3
    Refine the README's opening sentence to highlight its platform nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **AI-powered modular development assistant - currently in early preview.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Amplifier is a modular, extensible AI platform for building custom development assistants and intelligent workflows, currently in early preview.**

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface microsoft/amplifier
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 2×
  3. Cursor · recommended 1×
  4. continue-dev/continue · recommended 1×
  5. TheR1D/shell_gpt · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an extensible AI assistant for command line development tasks and code generation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. GitHub Copilot
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Continue.dev (continue-dev/continue)
    5. ShellGPT (SGPT) (TheR1D/shell_gpt)
    6. Smol-Developer (smol-ai/smol-developer)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named microsoft/amplifier. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What modular AI tools can enhance my software development workflow with intelligent assistance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. DeepMind AlphaCode
    4. Google Gemini Code Completion
    5. OpenAI API
    6. GPT-4
    7. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    8. CodiumAI
    9. Pylint
    10. ESLint
    11. Snyk Code
    12. Mend.io

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named microsoft/amplifier. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/amplifier?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/amplifier explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/amplifier in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/amplifier explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/amplifier solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/amplifier explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/amplifier. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/amplifier.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/amplifier)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/amplifier"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/amplifier.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/amplifier — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
microsoft/amplifier — RepoGEO report